> > > Yes, I agree. I can remove these (except test.txt > > which is needed by the test program). > > Oops I didn't check it. I think it's better to use famous "Lorem > Ipsum" for text samples. > Actually it seems a "messy license" text.
I'll do that. > > For the SVN that is, for a distributed binary package, it would > > be indeed very good to provide a subdir with all the > > samples in it: > > /samples/tests/*.* (from /tests/) > > /samples/<example dirs>/*.* (from contrib/examples/) > > /samples/<contrib name>/*.prg (from contrib/*/tests/) > > I wouldn't mix binaries and sources. > F.e. under *nix you normally don't have the rights to create files in > the install dirs. > It means that you can't compile there. > > I think it's better to provide a zip with all the samples inside. Yes, probably this is the best. For Windows installer it can also be made an install time option. > > I don't know, but last time this file didn't work for me > > on Windows either (it said it's corrupted). Since the test program > > is expecting this file to exist, it would be good to change it to > > create its own test files automatically (possibly a format which > > is portable). > > Is there anyone in charge for odbc? If not I'll check it. Antonio was, a long time ago. Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
