Przemek

Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
> 
> I've just verified with PellesC 4.50.15 and it generates wrong code
> for above function. I'll change the order of instruction in this function
> as some type of workaround for it but it should be reported to POCC
> author.
> It's serious bug.
> Please be careful with this compiler. It's not the 1-st and probably not
> the last bug found in this compiler during work on [x]Harbour code.
> Which version do you use?
> 

PellesC is not my production compiler. I was just testing it for 
ready-to-use distribution only. If you can explain what bug this
compiler has which should be reported to its author, I will send 
this report to Pelle. I downloaded the latest 5.0.1.

Regards
Pritpal Bedi

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/hb_gt_ItemBase%28%29-and-PellesC-tp22344045p22352553.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to