I have used is past hbmake and Now u use hbmk is power full and easy I'm working on my application compiled with different os and c compiler In hbmake each project file was for a specified compiler,Platform You change compiler you must rewrite all project file With hbmk is simple to use you simply pass as parameter your prg,c,rc,lib and you have your exe First you must load different library if you use a compiler and if you use multithread, now all
Also linux version of harbour is very simple to use for a newbies like me. Harbour itself is more consistent to the user I think that all update in hbmk are made to follow a rafinated and evolute request of Przemek for implement a complete replaceable with prev hbmk.sh. I think that is very good having easy to use tool , now the evolution transform also in Ultra Powerfull for evoluted user 2009/3/5 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas <[email protected]>: > Hi, Viktor, > > >> It would be nice to hear some comments on my fixes, I'm not sure what >> silence means :) But after like 30-40 fixes with no positive (or any) >> feedback it's really difficult to know where we stand. > > I'm not the makefile guru, I've never used hbmake or another harbour scripts > tools to compile my harbour application. I use my own .mak files. So, it's > difficult for me to write any comment on the job you are doing. I see a lot > of hbmk related commits. I understand it is still in active development > phase. Since I do not know makefiles very well, I want to wait a little and > test a "final" version. > > > Thanks, for your job, > Mindaugas > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > -- _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
