Imo also a light mingw with only used part of bin,lib,lincude No doc, no
unused tool, no debug lib

2009/4/1 Przemyslaw Czerpak <[email protected]>

> On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Second issue of the unified and self-contained Windows release
> > package, which is able to create x86, x64, WinCE/ARM executables
> > (both shared and static) out of the box without the need of any
> > external tools or settings. This time also in the form of installer,
> > with (de)selectable options.
> > Downloads:
> > http://www.syenar.hu/harbour/harbour-11-win-20090331.7z (size: 146MB)
> > http://www.syenar.hu/harbour/harbour-11-win-20090331.exe (size: 148MB)
> > To use:
> > 1) unpack/install to any directory (C:\harbour-11)
> > 2) go to bin dir (optional if you specify path for hbmk2)
> > 3) For x86 executable type: 'hbmk2 ../tests/hello.prg'
> > 4) For x64 executable type: 'hbmk2 ../tests/hello.prg -comp=mingw64'
> > 5) For WinCE/ARM executable type: 'hbmk2 ../tests/hello.prg
> -comp=mingwce'
>
> Very nice. Looks that using Harbour in Windows begins to be as simple
> as in *nixes ;-). Thank you very much.
> I have one request here. Please add to hbmk2 support for detecting
> CLIPPER and RTLINK as base names and switch to -hbcmp/-hblnk mode
> automatically plus add support for rtlink @file.lnk in such link mode.
> It should greatly help existing Clipper users to make some tests
> with Harbour. F.e. it will be enough to make:
>   copy hbmk2.exe clipper.exe
>   copy hbmk2.exe rtlink.exe
> and make tests using existing Clipper build scripts, f.e. with rmake.exe
> Of course if user does not use any 3-rd party libraries.
> >From .lnk file important is only list of files after FILE directive
> but we can add also support for LIB parsing and some basic translation
> for used lib names. AFAIR other directives can be ignored. Such parser
> can be implemented as separated single function and probably can be used
> also for BLINKER .lnk files.
>
> The whole distro is rather huge though it should not be big problem
> for normal usage. But if we have support for above CLIPPER/RTLINK
> emulation then we should think also about creating some minimal
> Harbour distribution with some small C compiler (f.e. POCC) for
> x...@32 only as startup and for Clipper users who want to make some
> tests with Harbour.
>
> best regards,
> Przemek
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>



-- 
Massimo Belgrano
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to