Hello, Pritpul,
The simplicity was the main goal, after I found original OLE is not
working (it was xHarbour times) and I was unable to understand some
implementation ideas.
If you are looking at it, please make it syntactically compliant with
hbwin/win_ole.c parameters, i.e., TOleAuto() class with <hObj> <oObj>.
Then it attains staus of replacing the hbwin->ole implementation.
I've chosen HB_OLEAUTO to be consistent with Harbour convention, I can
easily change it, but "TOleAuto" breaks this rule.
I'm against :hObj, because:
1) it does not allow to use any OLE classes having Hobj method;
2) it is internals of object, that's why we have __hObj (two
underscores). You should not use it at all.
Regards,
Mindaugas
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
