in opinion of most guru ( Bedi, Przemyslaw) that Harbour is today superior (fast and reliable) to xharbour but why not try the way of join either team Przemyslaw is very able to define a long term way (netrdd,gtnet) with more resource we will have a faster/better result But the question also for Rom and [x]Harbour Team which proposal is acceptable for join two team? they need a compatibility library We have a common dream, why not join effort for it Abbiamo un sogno comune, perchè non realizzarlo insieme
>..Sudip Bhattacharyya revealed an email discussion with Pritpal regarding this >matter. >Q. Is there any way to use xHarbour+wvg? >QUOTE by Pritpal Bedi >WVG as of now is not compilable with xHarbour. It is multi-windows, >multi-threaded approach and some very fine >new concepts which are only available in Harbour. >I had ported WVG to xHarbour but about 1.5 years before. That version is >workable but you have to compile it with your own >tools. Just look for xharbour/contrib/gtwvg folder in CVS. >Due to its limitations I am not contributing to xHarbour any more. 2009/4/24 Przemyslaw Czerpak <[email protected]>: > >> that was implemented in an intentionally incompatible manner. I hope that >> Harbour developers will decide to compromise their infinite need to improve >> on ideas borrowed from xHarbour, at least when such improvement breaks >> compatibility. I also hope that Harbour developers will understand the >> value of a unified user community, even if development efforts are not >> unified. > > It was my goal in the past to keep support for both compilers and I was > making it for really long time but in current days IMHO it's not worth > to longer invest time in xHarbour. It does not offer any interesting > functionality, it's much slower, some important things does not work at > all and it's very hard to force some deeper modifications by main door. > -- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
