On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi,
> Shouldn't we rather always generate hbvmmt, even in DOS, but > on these non-MT platforms hbvmmt be the same as hbvm. > I think we already do this for WinCE platforms. This way no such > platform tricks would be needed at build time. > What do you think? I think it could be source of some other problems. On some platforms support for threads can be optional and may depend on some other system libraries and/or kernel version. We have such situation in Linux. In such case introducing not fully functional hbvmmt when it's possible that working one also exists in some cases is not good idea. It may confuse users and it will be even possible that user by mistake will create wrong final binaries using wrong hbvmmt library. BTW I was wrong about MT in WinCE. Threads can be created and should work correctly and only it's not possible to execute simultaneously many processes in this OS. The background ones seems to be suspended. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
