On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Massimo Belgrano <[email protected]> wrote: > WvgActiveXControl cited on your changelog is XbpActiveXControl in xbase++
The current name is right. We've agreed that such Xbase++-like classes implemented in GTWVG get the names WVG* to not block us from creating a portable, standalone Xbase++ compatibility lib. If such compatibility class will be implemented in Harbour, it should be done in hbxbp, built on AX facilities implemented in hbwin. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
