I've been thinking on it out this weekend, and went to the conclusion that 2.0 would be the best version number for next release. Clean and simple, just on the merits of our improvements.
If there is anyone objecting it or has further thoughts on it, he is welcome to share it. Brgds, Viktor On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Angel Pais <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Group > > Functionallity is what people sees. > This version has 2 major quantum leaps from a programmer's POV. > 1- A fastastic Multithreading implementation > 2- A superb project builder > > This version deserves 2.0 on it's name > > Angel Pais > > PD: 3.0 would be the QT-Multiplattform code-once compile-everywhere enabled > right ? > > > Phil Barnett escribió: >> >> I agree that we can step it up. Why not 2.0.0? >> >> I've seen bigger upgrade jumps in software that didn't have 1/100th of the >> changes in this product between now and our last release. There's nothing to >> feel guilty about. >> >> I say, 2.0.0 and don't worry about the competition. > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
