For me STRICT is fine.
[ It's marked as Xbase++ because it definitely
isn't CA-Cl*pper, and it was the only (or first/best
known) matching HB_COMPAT_* for it at that time
(10 years ago). ]
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009.06.17., at 23:52, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, [email protected] wrote:
; TODO: Decide about the status of STOD() function, which is
currently an XPP compatibility function, not in Harbour
namespace, yet it's widely used with same functionality.
IMO covering it by HB_COMPAT_XPP was wrong and confusing.
STOD() function is much older then XBASE++. It's supported by nearly
all dbase compatible compilers so it should be default part of
Harbour.
If necessary excluded by HB_C52_STRICT. For sure it has nothing to
XBASE++
best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
