Thanks for your clarification is right
I have Copied from Jacek's message on xharbour'sNG
better explain

2009/6/30 Patrick Mast <[email protected]>

> Hello Massimo,
>
> Now you do it again.. ;-)
> After you copy/pasted Viktor's message on the xHarbour NG
> (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.xharbour/msg/ce086beccadd5a35)
> without saying this was a quote (Now it looks like Viktor posted the
> message) you do it again here with Jacek's message.
>
> Please try to put in a line "Copy from Jacek's message on xharbour's
> NG" at the beginning of your message. This makes it clear for other
> readers that you copy/paste Jacek's message from another source. I
> even want to go further. I think you should ASK the original writer to
> copy/paste HIS message on another forum.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Patrick
>
>  Victor,
> >
> >> What are those xhb extensions?
> >
> > Writing "xHarbour extentions" I mean our (OTC's) code (library) written
> > for Terminal GUI to support easier integration of xHarbour applications
> > with Terminal GUI environment. This code is written in xHarbour and C.
> > On the client (gte.exe) side it makes use of harbour.dll for execution
> > of the client-attached user RPC functions. You can read more about it in
> > point 3 of:
> > http://www.otc.pl/index.asp?s=92
> > and detailed description of the extention functions is in chapter V of
> > the Terminal GUI Programmer's Manual:
> > http://www.otc.pl/progmen.pdf
> >
> >> I wonder if we still have anything missing which would prevent
> >> supporting those for Harbour also. [ Unless this is some sort of
> >> business agreement between OTC and xhb.com, of course. ]
> >
> > There is nothing missing in Harbour which prevents us from preparing
> > Harbour versions of the Terminal GUI extension libraries. In fact, we do
> > already support new Harbour versions in Mediator and plan to support
> > them in Terminal GUI if there are such requests from Harbour users.
> >
> > And no, there is no any kind of agreement between xHarbour.com and OTC
> > which could limit our activity in this area :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jacek
> >
> >
> > 2009/6/28 Viktor Szakáts <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> What are those xhb extensions?
> >>
> >> I wonder if we still have anything missing which would prevent
> >> supporting those for Harbour also. [ Unless this is some sort of
> >> business agreement between OTC and xhb.com, of course. ]
> >>
> >> Brgds,
> >> Viktor
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Massimo Belgrano<[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Terminal GUI works with _any_ WIN32 application including Harbour
> >> > applications (either GUI or Console ones). However, the xHarbour
> >> > extentions are compiled using xHarbour and for now are available for
> >> > xHarbour only.
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Jacek
> >> >
> >> > 2009/6/26 Viktor Szakáts <[email protected]>:
> >> >> Does this also work with Harbour?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2009.06.26., at 1:47, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> A completely new multi-user remoting software from OTC has
> >> >>> been released and is available for download.
> >> >>> It allows running Windows GUI and Console applications
> >> >>> including xHarbour applications using any of the popular
> >> >>> GUI libraries.
> >> >>> New Terminal GUI and Terminal Console contain special
> >> >>> extentions for xHarbour users.
> >> >>> For product description please visit
> >> >>> Terminal GUI (for applications using Windows GUI interface)
> >> >>> http://www.otc.pl/index.asp?s=84&l=2
> >> >>> Terminal Console (for Windows console applications)
> >> >>> http://www.otc.pl/index.asp?s=85&l=2
> >> >>> Enjoy,
> >> >>> OTC team
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>> Simon pisze:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> What is the difference using this product over the built in
> Terminal
> >> >>>> Services functions in Windows?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 1. Special extentions for xHarbour users allow the application to be
> >> >>> aware about the remote mode of execution and use Terminal RPC
> (remote
> >> >>> procedure call) to easily call xHarbour code attached to gte.exe
> >> >>> (terminal client being executed on the client machine). This allows
> >> >>> (where appropriate) to split the application functionality between
> >> >>> server and client.
> >> >>> 2. In a few months we will release Linux client which is not
> natively
> >> >>> available for Terminal services.
> >> >>> 3. Ability to set up multi-user servers on Vista and XP (not on the
> >> >>> server systems only)
> >> >>> 4. Product remotes application windows only (not the entire desktop)
> >> >>> which is not available on some Terminal services versions
> >> >>> 5. It is cheaper. To legally use TS on Vista or Win2008 you need to
> >> >>> purchase both TS license and TS CAL license.
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>> Jacek
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Massimo Belgrano
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> Harbour mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Harbour mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Massimo Belgrano
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Harbour mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Harbour mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Massimo Belgrano
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Harbour mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>



-- 
Massimo Belgrano
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to