Revision: 11610
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11610&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-07-02 16:28:41 +0000 (Thu, 02 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
-----------
2009-07-02 09:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi ([email protected])
* contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp.prg
* contrib/hbxbp/xbpstatic.prg
+ Implemented XBPSTATIC_TYPE_BITMAP. It is not Xbase++ compatible
in the sense it is pulled from a disk file. But by attributes wise
it is exactly like Xbase++.
SUGGESSIONS: Should I implement Harbour extensions to the Xbp* classes?
I find a wide scope to add few more instance variables to the
class.
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/harbour/ChangeLog
trunk/harbour/contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp.prg
trunk/harbour/contrib/hbxbp/xbpstatic.prg
This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the
world's largest Open Source development site.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
