On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Abeb wrote: Hi,
> Will this work on Wince too, so we have a client/server solution for Wince? It should work with WinCE though seeing Jarek results from one tests in WinCE which was using sockets and threads I have very serious doubts if this OS can be used (is efficient enough) to execute server so server part should be installed rather on desktop. BTW it's not exactly client/server solution like in ADS or NETRDD if I finish it. It only replace file server protocol with own transport layer using TCP/IP socket. It may reduce network traffic a little bit because messages and data are usually very small and should be exchange in IP packets encapsulated single ethernet frames. I do not know the exact details of SMB protocol but it's possible that average overhead is higher. If someone wants then he can made such tests. I.e. count ethernet frames for netiotst.prg executed for network drive, i.e.: #define DBNAME "\\192.168.0.1\_tst_" and compare it with default: #define DBNAME "net:192.168.0.1:2941:_tst_" best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
