Yes,

the r3 is the one I'm using, anyway, I think we should remove os2-make.exe and
use the available one on user's system.

Maurilio.


Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Nevermind, I already see the new versions here:
> http://www.os2site.com/sw/dev/make/index.html
> 
> Brgds,
> Viktor
> 
> On 2009.09.15., at 15:35, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> 
>> Hi Maurilio,
>>
>> That's great news, both for Harbour and all OS/2 GNU Make
>> users I guess :)
>>
>> Could you replace /os2-make.exe in our repository with the
>> fixed version? If you have any pointers to publicly available
>> source code of maybe even fixed binary build, pls include
>> them as well in the entry.
>>
>> Brgds,
>> Viktor
>>
>> On 2009.09.15., at 15:26, Maurilio Longo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Viktor,
>>>
>>> I've got an answer from Andreas Buening, latest OS/2 porter, which has
>>> discovered a bug in OS/2 port which was affecting its behavior when
>>> calling a
>>> shell.
>>>
>>> So now I've got a version which passes the test makefile you sent me
>>> and which
>>> is able to build __dyn__.tmp file (32K more or less).
>>>
>>> Anyway, gcc on OS/2 does not support -shared and needs (as it seems)
>>> a .def
>>> file to build a .dll.
>>>
>>> I'm investigating this issue right now and I'll come back as soon as
>>> I have
>>> news or more problems :)
>>>
>>> Maurilio.
>>>
>>> PS. Maybe we could remove all other hacks with line lenght, but right
>>> now I'd
>>> better build a .dll which is more important, imho.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> __________
>>> |  |  | |__| Maurilio Longo
>>> |_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l.
>>>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Harbour mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> 

-- 
 __________
|  |  | |__| Maurilio Longo
|_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l.


_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to