Hi Victor
I wanted to say (one dirty solution ...)
Here is another using static instead of PUBLIC ...
STATIC FUNCTION Dialogs( cType, w, l )
static oDlg,oDlg2,oDlg3,oDlg4,oDlg5,oDlg6
local oUrl
DO CASE
CASE cType == "PageSetup"
if oDlg1 ==Nil
oDlg1 := QPageSetupDialog():new()
oDlg1:setWindowTitle( "Harbour-QT čššPageSetup Dialog" )
endif
oDlg1:show()
CASE cType == "Preview"
if oDlg2 ==Nil
oDlg2 := QPrintPreviewDialog():new()
oDlg2:setWindowTitle( "Harbour-QT Preview Dialog" )
endif
oDlg2:show()
CASE cType == "Wizard"
if oDlg3 ==Nil
oDlg3 := QWizard():new()
oDlg3:setWindowTitle( "Harbour-QT Wizard to Show Slides etc." )
endif
oDlg3:show()
CASE cType == "Colors"
if oDlg4 ==Nil
oDlg4 := QColorDialog():new()
oDlg4:setWindowTitle( "Harbour-QT Color Selection Dialog" )
endif
oDlg4:show()
CASE cType == "WebPage"
if oDlg5 ==Nil
oDlg5 := QWebView():new()
oUrl := QUrl():new()
oUrl:setUrl( "http://www.harbour.vouch.info"; )
QT_QWebView_SetUrl( QT_PTROF( oDlg5 ), QT_PTROF( oUrl ) )
oDlg5:setWindowTitle( "Harbour-QT Web Page Navigator" )
endif
oDlg5:show()
CASE cType == "Fonts"
if oDlg6 ==Nil
oDlg6 := QFontDialog():new()
oDlg6:setWindowTitle( "Harbour-QT Font Selector" )
endif
oDlg6:show()
ENDCASE
RETURN nil
My intention was to show why webpage when visited increases size
of used memory.
With this solution memory is increased only first time.
Of course, there are better solutions.
BRGS
Franček
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
>
> On 2009.09.16., at 10:16, Franček Prijatelj wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Pritpal
>>
>> In STATIC FUNCTION Dialogs You are using local oDlg which
>> is overwriten many times (you should delete QWidgets pointed to by it,
>> before allocating new ones)
>>
>> One solution (not going in other leaks) is this:
>>
>>
>> PROCEDURE Main()
>> Local oLabel, oBtn, oDA, oTabBar
>> Local oWnd, oSize
>> Local oMenuBar, pIcon
>> Local oMenuA, pAction
>> LOCAL oPS, oPPrv, oMB, oWZ, oCD, oWP, oSBar, oStyle
>> **** Add code
>> PUBLIC oDlg1:=oDlg2:=oDlg3:=oDlg4:=oDlg5:=oDlg6:=Nil
>> *********
>
> Sorry to jump in, but if there is anything else we
> can use instead of PUBLICs we should rather try to
> do so. For me it looks bad example to use PUBLIC vars
> in example code, as I'd surely wouldn't like to copy
> that in any sort of production code. Perhaps a local
> array could replace it.
>
> The other thing I don't understand is how is it
> possible to create leaks merely by using valid
> .prg code? Is it possible to solve this problem
> so that such thing cannot happen? Is there a manual
> way to free these objects?
>
> Brgds,
> Viktor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/demoqt-tests-with-debug_new---Leaked-objects-tp25434990p25468128.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
