>-----Original Message----- >From: Mindaugas Kavaliauskas [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:57 AM >To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. >Subject: Re: [Harbour] ActiveX and GPF > >Hi, > > >> 1. we can add additional "mark" function which will be registered >> with GC block together with cleanup function by hb_gcAlloc(). >> ... We can implement it >> without additional memory overhead and even increasing a little >> bit speed of existing GC core code but it will be necessary > >As always I vote for feature instead of backward compatibility :)
Manufacturers 3-libraries countries are waiting for stable version to comply with it. This behavior can maintain performance even when there is no backward compatibility is maintained. Harbor is so young that can not afford a failure to backward compatibility. For me it is about as "black magic", but the concept of "efficiency" I understand very well:) Regards, Marek Horodyski _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
