> Hi Viktor, > > As I see now, our common harbour project is viable just in the case of > integration an IDE offering the modern features. > I don't want to list them, as I see they are known by you.
They are, and while I still think a programming language like Harbour can be useful and usable in a lots of ways without a self-developed IDE or "Visual" IDE, such IDE should be developed by someone in the first place. Usefulness isn't really the question here. Although for the fun of it, we may start to brainstorm what would be the most important properties of a good Harbour IDE. To me: 0) Availability on OS X, Linux and Windows x86 and x64. 1) Very good editor with block editing capability, syntax highlighting, possibly "intellisense". Project-wide search and replace. Support for all CPs Harbour supports. 2) Integration with VCS. 3) Integrated build tool. 4) Integrated project management. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
