Hello Viktor
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > It is, but if you stick to the format, you can still use it. > In this case it'd be better to expose the parsing logic from hbmk2 > code through an API though. > Let it be like it. I will give another extension. I hope .id* extensions will prevail. Better options are welcome. > .hbp is the same as .hbm as far as the format goes, It's a > file which contains command line options with the exact same > syntax you would use on cmdline, you can have more than one > options in one line and you can have any number of lines. > Comment line begin with # as a convention. I suggest to create > one option each line to keep it clean. > Now I better understand .hbp and .hbm. I can build entire project only with .hbm. How does .hbc fits into the picture. Probably I may think of splitting the logic in .hbc and .hbm. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/HBIDE---An-Overview-tp26379927p26415302.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
