>> case, it's a single instance class. > > Yes Victor, I see your point. I insisted on a deeper aproach because I was > hoping the discussion would reach issues like singleton inheritance, but now > I understand it's not a convenient discussion for now. > >> >> If anything, Harbour may support single instance classes >> natively to help this case, and this is probably possible >> to add without deep changes, but I'm not sure we should add >> a brand new base variable type/scope/implementation until >> we know all the benefits which this can give us over already >> existing methods. > > Ok. > >> Few of us have proposed solutions, it'd >> be nice if you could comment on them. >> > > Oops! Sorry, I thought I was doing that!
Yes, I've seen it, but when I wrote my e-mail this wasn't yet the case. I'm happy for the healthy discussion since. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
