>> can you share your test to better understand? > > I am using a commercial DLL supplied to allow redemption and purchase of gift > vouchers. Many of the functions return arrays of objects (* IUnknown). With > Przemyslaw's changes (and not to forget the initial and ongoing contributions > from Mindaugas with ActiveX support and rewriting olecore.c) this kind of OLE > data is now supported. > > To my knowledge Harbour now supports all the forms of OLE data that xHarbour > supports, plus extras, in a safer way. ActiveX support is now more flexible > and safer than xHarbour. The C code is compact and clear (well, as clear as > OLE code ever is for me), allows the proper use of destructors and garbage > collection. All in all it is a fantastic job.
Yes, it's a very nice part of Harbour now. Thanks and congrats to Mindaugas and Przemek for the hard work on it. I'd even dare to use it in production at this point :) [ I'm also not a personal user of it, but similar magic would be very nice on .dll support. I tried to lookup such code in PERL/Python, but couldn't find out anything meaningful by sweeping through their code. ] Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
