> Viktor Szakáts wrote: >> Great. But folks pls lets not commit it to Harbour SVN, otherwise there will >> yet another things which will need permanent cleanup to keep our codebase >> coherent. > > No problem for me, but I do not understand that is wrong with such commit, > and what kind of cleanup are you talk about. One parameter is still valid way > to "call" HB_SYMBOL_UNUSED(), you do not need to define an extra unused local > variable to pass at lease two of them.
It's an option which adds just unnecessary "flexibility". The point of this macro is to _avoid it_, not to overuse it. Multiple params is just another synonym which makes editing and grepping harder and more error prone. I'm telling this after having been cleaned many tens of thousands of .prg code in Harbour SVN alone. So I don't see a reason why we should optimize such call and create another syntax variation for it, when it should be seldom used anyway in final code. BTW no wonder the macro name is long... It's not meant to be typed in huge amounts. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
