On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:23 PM, francesco perillo <[email protected]> wrote:
> But how can the compiler or the runtime understand when you want to > pass a string (in your case) or a hash (in my case) ? I'm not thinking about an universal new syntax but a way to make easier the write of some kinds of functions/methods like ... only avoids the use of xpar1, xpar2, xpar3, ..., xparn I didn't consider the support of complex data like arrays, hashes or codeblocks. The idea is to use it in "interface methods" where you usually pass simple data like numbers and strings. > The positive on your side is that you can build the parameter string > at runtime.... and pass parameters between two processes. Actually I use XML or JSON but they are too heavy to pass few parameters to a function. best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
