> vszakats wrote: >> >> 2009-12-08 11:30 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) >> * Deleted commented debug calls. >> > > Though this commit is a step forward in right direction, > I object in removing the debug calls, even those are commented ones. > > Please remember, the whole protocol is not yet stable > and I always need those calls whenever I turn my attention > to that angle. > > Though I undestand your viewpoint, but please keep these > calls as is.
Sorry, but if you need some debug calls, why are they commented? So much code is (still) commented, that I can just guess about the reasons in specific cases, and such accidental deletions are unfortunate, but inevitable in such an environment :( I'd again like to make a reminder for HB_TRACE() feature which has debug levels implemented, and this could be also very useful to handle such cases. It'd be good switch to HB_TRACE(). But it'd need those two extra features which I included in some recent TODOs, and which - after giving it some thoughts - I found too complicated - but only for me - to implement (optional OutputDebugString output, controllable from envvar, and accepting multiple parameters (?) or something like it). Any duplicate debug call handling logic is a terrible waste of energy and reinventing the wheel. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
