Hi Istvan,
> An another test case with full positive results with latest SVN and Qt 4.6
> for VS2008. The MinGW with Qt 4.6 and Qt 4.5.3 follows...
> hbide, demoxbp and demoqt are executed crash free, so we should concentrate
> on the functional issues from now, I think.
Is there any final result for the three different
memory handling modes?
IMO we should only leave one, the one which works
the most efficiently and without leaks.
Is it time to make the decision yet?
There are still a few remaining issue with HBQT:
- Eliminating all GPFs resulting from .prg coding errors.
- Initialization/deinitialization (mutex, slots, events) is currently
not foolproof and violates wrapper layer levels.
This may cause any sort of random crashes AFAICT.
- Potential (and real) leaks due to non-collected pointers used
in a few places:
QT_MYDRAWINGAREA()
QT_MYMAINWINDOW()
QT_HBDBFMODEL()
QT_HBTABLEVIEW()
QT_HBTABLEVIEW_NAVIGATE()
- Violation of layering by few object: MyDrawingArea(), MyMainWindow(),
DbfMode(), TableView(), SyntaxHighlighter().
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
