>> Are you using single thread HVM intentionally? > > No, in MT everything is ok, but I was rejected by Viktor, argued that MT > generates ~40% performance reduction.
I rejected it because it doesn't seem like a _real_ solution, just a hack which accidentally (or at least for unknown reason) works. IOW, we need to find the root of the problem instead of masking it. The other reason is that forcing MT - or any optional mode whatsoever - isn't a right solution for any problem. Or we shouldn't call such "option" an option. _MT_ is an option (and not default) in Harbour because it may cause existing user code to break, plus it has a significant performance hit on several targets. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
