Hi
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > Sorry to jump in, but IMO this is not very good idea. > > This is like forcing "CONSTRUCTOR" or even worse > "DEFAULT" methods to the class syntax. We don't have > it for good reason (f.e. code readability). > > This can save some typing but the time is lost > many times when others are trying to find out what > the code actually does. > TRUE. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Classes----xtranslate-QTextCursor%28-%3Cx%3E-%29-%3D%3E-QTextCursor%28%29%3Aconfigure%28-%3Cx%3E-%29-tp27250898p27251520.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
