Thanks Przemek. What you say is true, and I can only hope someone will offer his help to solve this. Until then we have no better choice than using current version. (and wait for the next bug report about another incompatible little detail ;)
[ BTW I never used ACHIOCE() since it was simpler to write a simple clone than to understand how this one works. ] Brgds, Viktor On 2010 Feb 10, at 20:22, Przemysław Czerpak wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > > Hi, > >> Plus another, maybe you missed it, but ac_test.prg >> fails after recent ACHOICE() patches, could you verify it? > > I've seen it but ac_test.prg and ac_test2.prg show that non > of Harbour ACHOICE versions is Clipper compatible and I hoped > that maybe someone will try to create new implementation from > scratch. > I'll fix the RTE which is result of typo in one of last commit > and yet another problem which can be seen in ac_test2.prg but > I really think we should find someone who will create new ACHOICE > implementation from scratch. Just simply current code it too > complicated and I do not believe that anyone created such > structure in Clipper. IMO real implementation is very trivial > and it should be enough to make precise tests in Clipper to > create compatible algorithm. > > best regards, > Przemek > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
