Pritpal continue "highly focused in hbide" and other people does not have hints for this case:

---------------------------
d) hbqt
  List of source files which have errors on OS/2 and detailed flow of tests
Alternatives:
  - Fix source code
  - Perhaps this code does not work on OS/2 - Qt

  But Pritpal is highly focused in hbide now   :-)

  Most errors are of kind:
  'A' is not a member of 'B'
  class 'C' has no member named 'D'
  'E' was not declared in this scope
  expected primary-expression before ')' token
  invalid use of incomplete type 'F'
  incomplete type 'G' used in nested name specifier
  forward declaration of 'H'
  expected type-specifier before 'I'

  I do not know if:
  - Are valid errors which must be fixed on Harbour
  - Other compiler switchs required
  - They are errors related to OS/2-Qt code and not Harbour

---------------------------

So I am still do not know if are errors in Harbour or OS/2-Qt

If they belong to hbqt and are not fixed, then derived tools as hbide will not work too


Now are ready new "Qt 4.5.1 GA Release (for OS/2)" but I am unsure if I must to test with current Harbour or wait response for previous errors

Notes for Qt 4.5.1 for OS/2:
- First I tried to build Qt451b5 libraries from source code (NetLabs), using os2gcc335-OMF type After some hours it build entirely and final directory reached 819 Mbytes (yes, 819 Mbytes :-) ). Qt is a monster
- I tried hbqt with these libraries and reported results
- Then I used pre-compiled Qt451b5 libraries from NetLabs available .wpi file. They used around 34 Mbytes - Repeated hbqt build with these Qt pre-compiled libraries and results were same, so was not a problem of my Qt libraries build
- Now for "Qt 4.5.1 GA"
 + I do not want to create Qt libraries from source code  :-)
 + Using Netlabs .wpi for libraries, dev, samples, ... are around 50 Mbytes
 I deleted old \qt451b5 directory and recovered my 819 Mbytes


David Macias


_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to