Maurizio la Cecilia wrote:
I agree with the uniqueness of the type, but i like HB_UCHAR. The 'unsigned' qualifier is declared, despite of HB_BYTE (signed or unsigned?). I know that it's more familiar, but not so precise as the HB_UCHAR (leaving no doubt about the sign).
For me, HB_BYTE implies raw data, and so I prefer it as it does not mention signedness at all.
Regards Alex _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
