Hi Chen, > <rant> > It hard to object if you already deleted them an hour later. > > You can say that ALL docs are 8 or 10 years old so why don't > just delete it all and be done with it. Some of the ES docs where > translation of original EN for standard Clipper/Harbour functions. > These should not changed in the past 10 years. I know that the > docs were neglected, but sometimes it is better to have some reference > to work with (future ES documenter) than to have nothing to start with. > (I know they are in the SVN tree but for most users they are now gone). > </rant> > > *sigh* above were just some ranting because you already deleted them, > I have some pending fix requests I made for them dusting in my mailbox > for about a decade. So lets continue.
Ok, sorry. I don't think it's very useful for us though. For me it has been giving 'dead' grep hits for years, I've raised this issue in the past a few times, moved it to examples a few years back, so there has quite some chances to "save it" in the past. Just having something in SVN gathering dust _is_ actually a bad thing and something that slows down other work. If someone wants to restart with it anytime, it can easily be restored from any release of Harbour from the last 5 years. Anyhow I think it's better to focus on English now. > Doc function header template can be found in doc/hdr_tpl.txt You're right. I forgot about it. > For start anyone want to contribute anything just post it to the > list and if no one else volunteer to act as an editor (preferably a native > English speaker) I can try to add them into SVN. > > Later if we will have enough material to work with, we can try adding > some indexing along with doc status (like the funclist.txt we had in the > old days). Yes. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
