Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
>> I will do after hbIDE reaches an acceptable stage.
>
> IMO we (well, you) should focus on making QT stable.
>
> F.e. I'm still getting the crash at program exit, and
> without wanting to go into it deeply, for me most
> menu functionality seemed broken. F.e. open file
> allows to select .hbi, then gives open error, project open
> didn't work, some menus didn't work (theme selection
> is still non-standard, which is rather strange), project
> import is non-intuitive with those two extra buttons,
> .hbp is still an import format, rather than native.
> .hbi is _still_ location (and thus platform) dependent.
> Slots/events mechanism is central and .prg level
> handling is also not well defined (holder variables
> needs to be created manually, while it could be
> part of app class or windows class). Too many to
> mention and the list is not shrinking, even though
> I'm only scratching the surface.
>
Today, no right now onwards, till hbIDE confirms to Harbour
norms on functionality levels, I am concentrating on this
subject only, no new features.
Keep on scratching next commits...
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
_a_student_of_software_analysis_&_design_
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/gtwvt-compatibility-issue-tp4631971p4650146.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
