> binaries-windows > 1.0.0 -> 2.824 > 1.0.1 -> 13.150 > > 2.0.0 -> 4.215 > > the trend is similar for binaries-ubuntu and source > > Are developers waiting for 2.0.1 :) or are there still a lot of them > using 1.0.1? > > What do you read in the stats ( or stars )?
There was just about a month between 1.0.0 and 1.0.1, and 1.0.1 had 1.5 years to gather this number of downloads. So naturally it's much higher. What we should really check to tell if 1.0.1 was indeed more popular is checking download in its first month only. Comparing 1.0.x and 2.0.x Windows binaries is not directly possible, as we had separate packages per compiler in 1.x and just one unified packages in 2.x, so latter will naturally be much lower. Anyhow 2.0.1 would definitely be better, the real question is how wants to back-port the bugfix patches (and spend the approx 2 days on creating the actual build - not counting any testing work). Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
