On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi,
> Is it reasonable result that in mingw MT mode, I'm getting > 21-22s result in 32-bit builds and 24-25s in 64-bit builds > vs. 10-11s in ST mode? No, it isn't reasonable ;) MinGW builds do not use native TLS and we disabled ASM inline functions used to retrieve HVM stack pointer because it was not working on Win9x so it hardly depends on HB_STACK_PRELOAD optimization and this macro was not set in hvmall.c I've just added it so please repeat your tests with current SVN code and send your final results. BTW it will be also good to check how works native thread local variables in current MinGW builds. My last test are quite old and it's highly possible that now the situation is much better. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
