Antonio Maniero wrote:
> 
> I hate heavy-weighted software then I gone to read QScintilla. Like the
> original Scintilla, seems to be a good piece of software and as
> light-weighted as possible to a full feature editor platform. Maybe
> dependencies could be a problem, I don't know.
> 

QScintilla is a class just like QTextEdit or QPlainTextEdit with many more
methods to manage text files supporting multiple lexers. Basically it
replaces
underlying document handlling and editing widgets of Qt. Nothing more...



> Did you build wrappers to access QScintilla directly by .prg code?
> 

No. As said earlier, to write wrappers to this class I need it be part 
of hbQT anyway. All alone it can only be used in a restricted manner.



> I am not saying you should use it on HbIDE, I just commented about it. You
> know HbIDE structure and tried QScintilla and can say better than I if
> QScintilla is valuable to HbIDE achieve its goals and what goals will be
> for
> now and for future.
> 

If I base hbIDE on top of it, only then it is useful. Otherwise one has to 
write wrappers for it in Harbour and have to exploit it directly, but how,
I do not know.



> I think QScintilla is useful basically to HbIDE or to an alternative to
> HbIDE, it's very specific to a code editor implementation.
> 

It is not an alternative to hbIDE. It can be an aid to it, and more so,
if some more exotic features we wish to include in hbIDE. For example,
code folding and line wrapping etc.

Anyway the whole subsystem of user interaction has to be build on 
top of it and through the container widgets. This itself, like other Qt
widgets
only provide class/methods hirarchy.


-----
     enjoy hbIDEing...
        Pritpal Bedi 
http://hbide.vouch.info/
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://harbour-devel.1590103.n2.nabble.com/QScintilla-Harbour-Port-tp5061833p5062413.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to