Just wanted to put in my two cents on the subject. I agree with the first poster, that the piece of paper received through the mail is the BEST form of QSL's to receive. But, as pointed out in another post, a lot of stations don't have the time (staff) to compete ones request. I guess we should just go with what works, and be happy we can get a reply any more, as a LOT of stations aren't even bothering to reply lately. In the case of mentioned Radio Farda, yes I did get the (proposed automated) standard reply, but they still haven't responded via the mail for reports to the adresses given in various places and a letter direct to the transmitter site. So, since they attach your email to the automated responce, I would have to say it is a verification (dirty as it may be!). I am still waiting for the legal way on Radio Free Asia, and Radio Free Afghanistan, even though I have an "automated" verification from the transmitter site on those two as well. Oh well, we do what we can do.....
Bob Combs, KCA6RC New Mexico, USA ---[Start Commercial]--------------------- World Radio TV Handbook 2003 is out! Order it now! http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0823059677/hardcoredxcom ---[End Commercial]----------------------- ________________________________________ Hard-Core-DX mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ _______________________________________________ THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License published by Michael Stutz at http://dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt
