** MEXICO [and non]. I wanted to include the city-to-city distances for my June
23-24 logs, but that would have delayed the report even further. Now I have
looked them up from http://www.distancefromto.net/
with km and miles; and also take the opportunity to offer a summary of the
logs, not including ones which were not certain enough:
90.7, XHOY, Guadalajara, Jal. 1831 1138
88.1, XHZN, Zamora, Mich. 1876 1166
92.7, XHRTA, Aguascalientes, Ags. 1671 1038
93.1, XHEI, San Luís Potosí, SLP 1613 1002
95.5, XHRO, Zapopan, Jal. 1831 1138
97.7, XHSNP, San Luís Potosí, SLP 1613 1002
99.5, XHLS, Guadalajara, Jal. 1831 1138
93.5, XHLAZ, Ciudad Guzmán, Jal. 1937 1204
90.1, XHTGO, Tlaltenango, Zac. 1548 962
97.5, XHPQ, León, Gto. 1740 1081
95.1, XHEL, Fresnillo, Zac. 1548 962
96.5, XHZER, Guadalupe, Zac. 1584 984
104.3, XHUDG, Guadalajara, Jal. 1831 1138
102.1, XHESL, San Luís Potosí, SLP 1613 1002
100.1, XHSE, Acapulco de Juárez, Gro. 2183 1357
96.3, XEJB, Tlaquepaque, Jal. 1832 1138
88.7, XHJX, Querétaro, Qro. 1776 1104
101.7, XHEMM, Morelia, Mich. 1886 1172
93.5, XHNY, Irapuato, Gto. 1782 1107
95.1, XHNH, Irapuato, Gto. 1782 1107
105.9, XHQJ, Guadalajara, Jal. 1831 1138
90.7, XHJRZ, Jerez de García Salinas, Zac. 1608 999
90.3, XHQS, Fresnillo, Zac. 1548 962
93.5, XHQC, Saltillo, Coah. 1257 781
100.9, XHCAA, Aguascalientes, Ags. 1671 1038
93.3, XHEHZ, Zacatecas, Zac. 1583 984
97.1, XHQB, Tulancingo, Hgo. 1816 1129
88.1, XHRED, México, DF 1913 1189
90.1, XHRYS, Reynosa-Matamoros, Tamps. 1149 713,
1172 728
90.1, XHMU, Tampico, Tamps. 1577 980
93.5, XHQC, Saltillo, Coah. 1257 781
95.3, XHOX, Tampico, Tamps. 1577 980
95.3, XHLRS, Villagrán, Tamps. 1336 830
96.5, XHMSN, Cadereyta, N.L. 1221 758
96.5, XHZER, Zacatecas, Zac. 1583 984
97.7, XHSNP, San Luís Potosí, SLP 1613 1002
101.3, XHAW, Monterrey, N.L. 1214 755
106.1, XHITS, Monterrey, N.L. 1214 755
99.3, XHHHI, Hidalgo del Parral, Chih. 1285 799
97.1, XHPE, Torreón, Coah. 1318 819
97.3, XHZR, Zaragoza, Coah. 925 575
99.3, XHJL, Guamúchil, Sin. 1557 967
88.3, KNAI, Phœnix AZ 1335 830
88.3, KBNR, Brownsville TX 1169 726
90.3, KEDT, Corpus Christi TX 958 595
92.1, KZUA, Holbrook AZ 1122 697
104.3, KEZP, Bunkie LA 803 499
97.7, WTGN, Lima OH 1291 802
97.3, WMNX, Wilmington NC 1824 1133
About my method of DXing and reporting: my objective is not to rack up station
totals; indeed I have no idea what they would be in some 60 years of DXing.
Sorry, but my eyes glaze over seeing long lists of logs, one-liners with no or
minimal details, tho they save a lot of space in printed bulletins. And is it
really of interest to anyone but the logger, whether an item is NEW or not? I
recall that a few of mine this day were logged previously, but don`t keep track
with any tally.
Instead, I enjoy learning more and more about geography, culture, business,
radio station practices, language, etc., etc. – each log a potential learning
experience; and often the subsequent challenge of figuring out an ID from clues
logged. So the more detail the better. Also, my observations can be added to
database info where lacking.
I long ago quit actively collecting QSLs, so these details are not to convince
a station I heard them. But SHAME upon anyone who would use my details to
garner undeserved QSLs, pretending they actually DXed the stations. I feel this
is hardly a real problem since most of the stations could be ``pretend-DXed``
on webcasts now anyway, if one is really so dishonest (Glenn Hauser, OK, DX
LISTENING DIGEST)
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
_______________________________________________
THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
