You're probably right. This is just something I've neve tried to do, so I was uncertain as to whether it would work, particularly (as I explained previously) because there seemed to be an ambiguity in how it could be interpreted. I'll have to go back to the documentation and take a closer look.
--- Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Regarding the "?+1" symbol and having multiple > searches, in my line below: > FDA(200.02,"?+2,?+1",.01)= TMGDivison > It looks like there are two searches in this line. > But doesn't the "?" symbol mean search only the FIRST > time it is used? After that it becomes a placeholder > for the already-looked-up record. So in this case, > the ?+1 had been used before to find the record, so > the only search is the ?+2 symbol. This is quite > confusing to me. I think I would have set this > interface up differently... > ===== A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. --Benjamin Disraeli ==== Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
