See below
--- "Nancy E. Anthracite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> If C code can be put into M code with GTM, could we
> use open source PGP type 
> encryption for this wtihout having to rewrite it in
> M?  On the other hand, we 
> have to put it into the Delphi end as well.  Can you
> shove C code into Delphi 
> somehow?  

Yes, this can easily be done.

Exactly what is being encrypted?  The signiture, or
the documents being stored?

Kevin



> 
> On Friday 17 December 2004 06:34 am, Lloyd Milligan
> wrote:
> > Once again, my fingers found the "Send" hotkey
> before I'd finished
> > replying. As I was saying, a modified version of
> ^XUSHSH was released that
> > includes a simple cipher.  I believe this code may
> have been intended as a
> > placeholder for real encryption.  It is easily
> invertable and should not be
> > used for an electronic signature.
> >
> > Lloyd
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lloyd Milligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to set up
> electronic signature.
> >
> > > VA encryption code is not present in the public
> release.  Here is the
> > > FOIA version of ^XUSHSH -
> > >
> > > XUSHSH   ;SF-ISC/STAFF - PASSWORD ENCRYPTION
> ;3/23/89  15:09 ;
> > >         ;;8.0;KERNEL;;Jul 10, 1995
> > >         ;; This is the public domain version of
> the VA Kernel.
> > >         ;; Use this routine for your own
> encryption algorithm
> > >         ;; Input in X
> > >         ;; Output in X
> > > A        Q
> > > EN(X)    Q X
> > >
> > >
> > > However, a modified version, probably from
> WorldVistA includes a simple
> > > invertable cipher at EN^XUSHSH.  The tag line
> reads -
> > >
> > > EN(X) ; generic hashing algorithm -- ASCII
> encoding of string
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Roy Gaber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:17 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] How to set up
> electronic signature.
> > >
> > >> The encryption code should not be present in
> the public release of
> > >> VistA.
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Kevin
> > >> Toppenberg
> > >> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:02 PM
> > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to set up
> electronic signature.
> > >>
> > >> Yes they were replaced.  I know this, because I
> want
> > >> to replace them in my site.  I don't like the
> > >> requirements for upper and lower case, a number
> and
> > >> punctation.  I'm not completely sure, as I
> write, if
> > >> it the encryption code that enforces this, or
> the
> > >> input transform on the field.  But I tracked
> down the
> > >> module that does the encryption.  Its not
> terribly
> > >> complicated--but it will work.
> > >>
> > >> Kevin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- "Nancy E. Anthracite"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> I believe the encryption algorithms for the
> > >>> electronic signature codes and
> > >>> access and verify codes were removed.  What
> were
> > >>> they replaced with, if
> > >>> anything?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thursday 16 December 2004 08:01 pm, Kevin
> > >>>
> > >>> Toppenberg wrote:
> > >>> > Found the answer (in the fine manual)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > You have to go into: TIU IRM MAINTENANCE
> MENU,
> > >>>
> > >>> then
> > >>>
> > >>> > into TIU SET-UP MENU, then TIU BASIC
> PARAMETER
> > >>>
> > >>> EDIT.
> > >>>
> > >>> > And there you select your institution and
> then
> > >>>
> > >>> "YES"
> > >>>
> > >>> > to "ENABLE ELECTRONIC SIGNITURE"
> > >>> >
> > >>> > And hallajah, it now works.  :-)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Kevin
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --- "Nancy E. Anthracite"
> > >>>
> > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > > Kevin, pure guesses, but did you give your
> > >>>
> > >>> providers
> > >>>
> > >>> > > the ORES key for doc.
> > >>> > > The description of the key is:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > This key is given to users that are
> authorized
> > >>>
> > >>> to
> > >>>
> > >>> > > write orders in the chart.
> > >>> > > Users with this key can verify with their
> > >>>
> > >>> electronic
> > >>>
> > >>> > > signature patient
> > >>> > > orders. This key is typically given to
> licensed
> > >>> > > Physicians. Orders entered by
> > >>> > > users with this key can be released to the
> > >>>
> > >>> ancillary
> > >>>
> > >>> > > service for immediate
> > >>> > > action. DO NOT give users both the ORES
> key and
> > >>>
> > >>> the
> > >>>
> > >>> > > ORELSE key.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Thursday 16 December 2004 06:11 pm,
> Kevin
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Toppenberg wrote:
> > >>> > > > I am now trying to set up my production
> > >>>
> > >>> system.
> > >>>
> > >>> > > > I have created users, and given everyone
> > >>>
> > >>> mailboxes
> > >>>
> > >>> > > > (not sure if this applies).  But I can't
> seem
> > >>>
> > >>> to
> > >>>
> > >>> > > get
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > the system working for signing progress
> notes.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > I am not working with CPRS (yet).  I am
> trying
> > >>>
> > >>> to
> 
=== message truncated ===



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good. 
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to