I use the Sentillion components and they could be switched out to
another component with the same interface, but that would be like
anything else.  If you take RPC Broker, made something that looked just
like it but spoke over XML and Web Services - then yes, you can swap it
out.

On the server/client communication for CCOW, it is HTTP-like traffic but
I'm not sure what's "swappable".  The Sentillion pieces have a very good
architecture for support (in terms of accessing client CCOW Managers,
logs, status, etc) and I'm not sure if this is part of the "standard".

Being "standard compliant" doesn't mean you can't add on.  As such, it
may make more sense to think about implementing a client and server
component that works together rather than replace any one piece of a
given solution.

Does anyone else know of other CCOW enabling frameworks?

/David.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
steven mcphelan
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:42 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] HealtheVet Desktop Components

If anyone wants to implement CCOW as David and Cameron has stated, you
have
to have two components.  One is applications which are CCOW enabled.  If
an
application is compliant with CCOW standards, then that application
should
be able to run whether or not a context manager is online or not.  The
second component is a CCOW content manager.  As Cameron stated, the VA
chose
to implement Sentillion's content manager which is proprietary.
However, if
any application is CCOW compliant, they should work with any CCOW
manager.
I am not 100% certain about that last statement.  Even though an
application
is CCOW complaint, I do not know the CCOW standards well enough to know
if
one's application is 100% CCOW standard compliant, will that application
work with any CCOW content manager with no modification required?  But
even
if modification is required, it should be rather simple to modify since
I
would assume that the CCOW code would be encapsulated and thus easily
modified to work with any CCOW manager.

The CCOW manager by itself is not dependent upon any specific patient
database.  The applications submit the content requests to the CCOW
manager
for that manager to maintain and coordinate with any other applications
you
may be running that are CCOW compliant.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nancy E. Anthracite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] HealtheVet Desktop Components


> No, Nancy hasn't done it and I strongly doubt Nancy will have the
foggiest
> idea how to help if she did try it.  Remember, Nancy was the one who
asked
> what CCOW is. ;-)



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to