I intended to be present at the discussions in Boston, however,
a more pressing matter involves that I'll be in Odessa (Ukraine)
that week, so I had to cancel travel plans to Boston.

To all who are there: all the best and enjoy the festif\vities around
the eve of $Horolog=60,000.

Here's what this message is about:

Every now and then I get contacted with questions about the
current status of the MDC. And every now and then there is
a suggestion to "revive" the committee.

The current status of the committee is:
- it still exists
- the most recent meeting was in September 1999
  (during this meeting only organizational issues were discussed)
- the most recent meeting where there was a discussion
  of any techinical issues was in September 1998
- depending on the criteria to determine membership,
  current membership is any number of institutions
  (not individuals) between 6 and 23.

My personal opinion about the MDC is:
- The committee "as we know it" has served its purpose
  and currently has no purpose anymore.
- If a roster of work could be defined for a new organization
  that would build upon the work of the MDC, it is better
  to shut down the MDC and start a new organization with
  its own mission and its own bylaws.
- Converting the MDC into a new organization without
  violating any of the bylaws of the MDC is close to
  impossible.

Further background:

There are many models on which a Standards Developing
Organization (SDO) can be based. We are familiar with the models
of ANSI and ISO, and we are aware of the models used by IEEE, w3c
and DICOM. However, there is one aspect that is common to all
standards and models of operation: there is a group of
implementors who are committed (either voluntarily as in ANSI and
ISO, or by contract as in DICOM and some subgroups of IEEE) to
implement any changes to the standard within a certain amount of
time after the publication of a new standard.

The MDC published its last official standard in 1995. This
standard has been implemented fully in only one implementation
(DSM), which is currently no longer supported. All
implementations that are currently on the market did not
implement one or more details from this standard. Since the
commercial success of all of these implementations is sufficient
for the needs of their users and implementors, there are are not
even plans to implement the remaining details.

As fas as the other MUMPS related standards is concerned
(OMI, GKS Binding, X-Window binding, MWAPI): OMI is still
supported by some vendors, but I am not aware that any of the
other standards is still actively supported by any vendor.

After the 1995 MDC standard became official, well over 100
modifications to that standard were approved by the MDC, and
almost none of these have been implemented by any implementor.
Clearly, there is no group of implementors who are committed to
implementing any of the MDC's standards, and therefore it is my
opinion that the MDC as a committee has outlived its usefulness
and ought to be formally dissolved.

Note that, whether or not an MDC exists, the ISO standards will
continue to exist, until ISO votes them out of existence. In the
fall of 2005, ISO will review the status of the MDC documents,
and, as far as I know, the recommendations from the various
member countries are to re-affirm the documents (Language Standard,
OMI and MWAPI) with the intent to stabilize them, in other words,
it looks like ISO will retain the standards for the forseeable
future. Also, as long as these documents are ISO standards,
the copyrights for the documents will remain at ISO.

Of course, if the MDC decides to dissolve itself, appropriate
notice should be given to ISO, and a decision should be made
as to who would become (or remain) responsible for the maintance
the new documents. The current MDC liaison and project editor
is Kate Schell.

Aside note: the current document editor for the draft MDC Standards
is Ed de Moel.


Respectfully submitted, Ed de Moel Secretary of the MDC.

--
**************************************************************
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or
privileged information intended only for the person(s) named.
Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person
is strictly prohibited.
**************************************************************



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded DevCon 2005
Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications & content.  Register
by 3/29 & save $300 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6883&alloc_id=15149&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to