I can understand how new modules (a.k.a packages) built on top of VistA
infrastructure could be licensed under GPL, but I cannot believe that
software obtained via FOIA could simply "declared" to be open source.
====
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 24, 2005, at 1:44 PM, Roy Gaber wrote:
VistA is Public Domain, not Open Source, always has been, always (at
least
should) will be.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ignacio
Valdes
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
I would suspect that the license would have to come down to either GNU
GPL or FreeBSD type-license. Now, deciding between the two: let the
games begin! :-)
-- IV
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
