The VPN/WAN is via TCP I believe.  I don't know how to
monitor the window size, and I don't think I can alter
it anyway.

Kevin


--- Gregory Woodhouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Do you run the VPN over TCP or UDP? I know that TCP
> based RPC protocols 
> (like the one used by the Broker)  are still
> problematic over a WAN, 
> but this would at least take window size at the VPN
> level out of the 
> equation. You can also monitor window size using a
> tool like tcpdump.
> 
> ====
> Gregory Woodhouse
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 11, 2005, at 9:23 PM, Cable One wrote:
> 
> > After reading all of the interesting comments
> regarding the cause of 
> > the
> > slow CPRS I would like to throw in my 2 cents
> worth.
> >
> > I am not sure that this is a BANDWIDTH problem,
> but rather a problem 
> > of the
> > WAN (wide area network) not being designed to
> handle the kind of 
> > network
> > traffic that it is being tasked with. I am rather
> new to Vista and 
> > CPRS, but
> > I am a bit of an old hand with the design of wans
> for all sorts of 
> > network
> > traffic.
> >
> > The performance of a client-server relation pair
> is mostly dependant 
> > upon
> > the sort of network traffic that will travel upon
> it. Given that we are
> > running this on tcp/ip I will focus there. When we
> speak of bandwidth, 
> > most
> > of use really mean THROUGHPUT or how much data can
> I move in some unit 
> > of
> > time. TCP uses the concept of a window to control
> the flow of data and
> > verify that all of the packets get to their
> destination. This window 
> > is just
> > the number of packets (or bytes of payload data)
> that the sender will 
> > send
> > until it insists upon receiving an acknowledgement
> from the receiver. 
> > As the
> > receipt of this ackknowledgement requires a round
> trip from sender to
> > receiver to sender, this throughtput can be
> described as:
> >
> >     T  = WINDOW(in bytes) / RTT(round trip time)
> >
> > The RTT is made up of 3 components:
> >     1. Propagation delay. Set by nature as in the
> speed of light or
> > electricity through a wire (60-80% C)
> >     2. Queueing delay. The waiting time in the
> tcp/ip stacks of 
> > routers,
> > interfaces, switches etc.
> >     3. Transmission delay. This is the BANDWIDTH.
> This is the speed 
> > with
> > which you can load the media. How fast can data be
> put into the end of 
> > the
> > wire/optical fiber etc.
> >
> > The window size is variable, negotiated by the
> tcp/ip stacks at either 
> > end
> > of the connection. The propagation  delay is
> mostly out of our 
> > control. The
> > queueing delay is mostly out of our control. The
> transmission delay we 
> > can
> > have some sort of control over bits of it....how
> fast is my ethernet
> > connection to the router? how fast is the DSL that
> I am paying for? 
> > Most of
> > these parameters are not in our immediate control
> at all, and can only 
> > be
> > measured in aggregate with other parameters. We
> can buy more bandwidth 
> > on
> > our DSL connection and this will have the effect
> of lowering the
> > transmission delay (ie, increasing bandwidth) but
> this only has a 
> > limited
> > effect on increasing the throughput of the
> connection.
> >
> > This discussion has made the assumption that we
> are looking at the 
> > steady
> > state transmission of a data stream. You can see
> (I hope) that the
> > throughtput gets exponentially worse with
> increasing RTT. This REALLY 
> > causes
> > problems when the nature of the client-sever
> traffic is not a steady 
> > stream,
> > but rather a series of short transactions. In a
> network with highly 
> > variable
> > RTT and lots of short transactions the transfer of
> data can be almost
> > unbearable. Welcome to the world of using
> Microsoft Access over the 
> > internet
> > with a VPN. Its performance is terrible.
> >
> > If CPRS is communicating with lots of short
> messages, this can make 
> > VPN over
> > the internet a less than desirable network design.
> Buying more 
> > bandwidth
> > will help some, but may not be a cost effective
> solution in your case. 
> > Given
> > what was said about the configuration of the
> network described I would 
> > want
> > to know more about what else was being done with
> Internet traffic in 
> > the
> > remote and local lans, ie how many people are
> doing streaming audio, 
> > video
> > etc. I do not think that bandwith monitoring would
> be of much value. I 
> > would
> > be more interested in conversation
> monitoring.....or looking at the
> > individual tcp data streams between server and
> client (vista and CPRS) 
> > and
> > analyzing those in terms of delay times and
> retransmission requests.
> >
> > I hope that these ramblings have been of some
> value. I would be glad to
> > deepen this conversation privately or on the
> phone.
> >
> > By the way, software firewalls do not use any more
> bandwidth than 
> > hardware
> > firewalls. Under the covers they are exactly the
> same thing.....CPU 
> > running
> > some program connected to a couple of NICs.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Donald R. Donigan
> > donigan technology, LLC dba
> > Desert CODE Works
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 -
> Release Date: 5/10/2005
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space
> Sweepstakes
> > Want to be the first software developer in space?
> > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
> >
>
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Hardhats-members mailing list
> > Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
> 
=== message truncated ===



                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to