OK. So XQOR is not in the OE/RR namespace, I assume. What is the meaning of: "COMPONENT: Protocol Menu" and "USAGE: Private"?
Thanks Kevin --- Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kernel grants to OE/RR only permission to set the > variable XQOR. > > --- Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OK. I looked at the document. I have copied the > > first entry here. Can you tell me what I am > looking > > at in this example? > > > > TIA ;-) > > > > Kevin > > > > > > All Active Integration Agreements FEB > > 18,2004 14:00 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > 1 NAME: DBIA1 CUSTODIAL PACKAGE: KERNEL > > > San Francisco > > SUBSCRIBING PACKAGE: ORDER ENTRY/RESULTS REPORTING > > > Salt Lake City > > USAGE: Private ENTERED: JUL > 27,1989 > > STATUS: Active EXPIRES: > > DURATION: Till Otherwise Agr VERSION: > > FILE: ROOT: > > DESCRIPTION: TYPE: > Other > > > > ROUTINE: > > COMPONENT: Protocol Menu > > VARIABLES: XQOR Used > > Set, when an option with type > protocol > > menu is encountered, to the internal > > number of the option before > execution is > > turned over to OE/RR. > > > > > > --- Cameron Schlehuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Actually, there are hundreds of APIs that are > > > documented as "Supported" > > > which means they can be used without registering > as > > > "subscribers" of the > > > APIs. And there are hundreds more that are > > > "Private" or "Controlled" which > > > means that they can be used after being formally > > > registered as a > > > "subscriber". You can find some relatively up > to > > > date lists at: > > > > > > ftp://ftp.va.gov/vista/Software/Integration%20Agreements/ > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Behalf Of Kevin > > > Toppenberg > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 9:16 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Question on > updating > > > the database > > > > > > And for that reason, it seems that each package > > > should > > > provide an API for its services. Somewhat along > the > > > lines of Microsoft Word providing its services > > > programitically via a COM object. Obviously > there > > > in > > > not an analagy to COM in VistA, but an API would > be > > > do-able. I don't think this is a current > standard. > > > Am I wrong? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Kevin > > > > > > --- Cameron Schlehuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > If the class definitions include invoking all > the > > > VA > > > > FileMan actions > > > > associated with the field or fields, then at > least > > > > from the database > > > > perspective integrity would be preserved. > > > However, > > > > in VistA the principles > > > > established for preserving integrity go beyond > > > just > > > > database integrity. The > > > > database is not considered to be a > free-for-all > > > for > > > > all packages and direct > > > > database access to package (aka service) data > in > > > > Class I applications, > > > > unless otherwise approved and documented, is > only > > > > through the custodial > > > > package's services. That helps insure that > > > package > > > > (service) data retains > > > > its integrity according to the business rules > of > > > the > > > > service. > > > > > > > > Cameron > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Behalf Of Madhavi > > > > Bagepalli > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:40 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > > > [email protected] > > > > Subject: [Hardhats-members] Question on > updating > > > the > > > > database > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is a question I was asked by one of my > team > > > > members. I am not sure of > > > > the right answer. Cananyone tell me if this is > > > > allowed? > > > > > > > > 'Intersystems is providing a conversion tool > which > > > > converts FileMan > > > > definitions to Cache class definitions. The > > > > resultant Cache classes can be > > > > enable to support writing to the database, > either > > > > through an Object.%Save(), > > > > > > > > Object.%Delete() or SQL INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. > If > > > > these methods are > > > > supported in the class(ie the class is not > made > > > > readonly) is this considered > > > > > > > > a 'legal and sanctioned' method for effecting > the > > > > database?' > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Madhavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! > > > > Download today - it's FREE! > > > > > > > > > > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space > > > > Sweepstakes > > > > Want to be the first software developer in > space? > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
