Fair enough, Steve. I thought that with the use of namespaces, VistA
was well partitioned, but I probably don't understand its interwoven
intricacies. I know GT.M, but not VistA.
-- Bhaskar
Tomlinson, Steven B wrote:
That all sounds good, my concern, just for the sake of discussion, is that
the routines and business logic may be so tightly integrated across
packages/namespaces that the advantages of physically partitioning the data
may not be realized sufficiently to justify the added system administration
overhead of managing multiple databases.
Steven B. Tomlinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pacific Telehealth and Technology Hui
www.PacificHui.org
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
