I want to add to this thread on tools for asymmetric broadcast of group events via Teamspeak or whatever. I was one of about 6 folks benefited by Nancy's enterprise of Teamspeak at Boston. First I think video is highly overrated for "ambient visuals", like the proverbial talking head image. If the visuals are actual content of a demo computer screen that is more worthwhile than talking heads at a podium or ambient poor quality charts or projected screen content. Voice alone carries huge content and it is worth the smaller bandwidth that it needs. If any visual is broadcast, it should focus only on content that has been prepared as digital images, or if it is a running computer demo, something like flash format is more efficient bandwidth ....but I don't know what tool will package flash for streaming broadcast.

When doing a audio broadcast, Teamspeak can allow the recipients to convene their own audio chat during intermissions in formal presentations, but etiquette and some moderator for that process is important to not interfere with the formal broadcast content. The internal audio channels can also allow passing questions back to a moderator at the group location, but it is problematic for a moderator at that location to use audio mode during presentations. The keyboard chat channels allow text comment among recipients and also text channels for passing questions back to a moderator at the group event. It is important to keep in mind that the accumulated content of any text chat does not have persistence and dies whenever the Teamspeak server goes down intermittently. For this reason, it's important to maintain formal announcements such as speaker schedules and login instruction on something like a a group email thread using "reply all". This succession of emails keeps everyone known to the broadcast aware of configuration rules and scheduling. Another better approach for persistence is to prepare a web URL/site in advance and update it for everything that needs persistence during the event....don't know if Teamspeak or other tools have a way to mirror text/chat for persistence. Ideally any effort to provide asymmetric real time content should merge into an archive of that same content; Nancy has pursued the intial pieces. Thanks to Nancy for her April effort which generated zero CO2 from jet fuel per amount of content delivered.

Rusty

Nancy Anthracite wrote:
I am VERY interested in Pediatrics.

At the last meeting in Boston, we used TeamSpeak to broadcast the proceedings. We looked at Gnome Meeting and Netmeeting, which are both supposed to work together, for Atlanta, but we did not have the bandwidth to use it. The plan was to use Netmeeting and GnomeMeeting for the video broadcast, whiteboard and I think instant messaging as well, and Shoutcast for the audiobroadcast. Frankly, I do not remember all of the logic of that, but I could dig up my old email on the subject if you are interested.

Typical video broadcasts with a decent resolution chew up the equivalent of a standard DSL line worth of bandwidth or more. Teamspeak, which is only Audio, has a lot going for it as you can adapt the codecs to match the available bandwidth. We did not use the full functionality of Teamspeak by any means. There is an issue with firewalls for the server though, so I suspect that you have to do quite a bit of homework before you will be sure that it or any of this software will function in the setting of your meeting. We were lucky in Boston in that Intersystems went out of their way to allow our TeamSpeak server to be outside of the firewall, which was a hassle for them. We really appreciated the effort put in to keep that network tuned throughout the meeting. We could have used Apache to post slides, but yours truly was otherwise occupied and didn't do it. I hope that if we do this for our next meeting.

If you would like to talk about it, you can contact me off the list as this is probably already more than anyone wanted to know!

On Thursday 30 June 2005 08:07 am, Alric wrote:

Joseph & Nancy, this may bounce again so please forward to the Hardhats
list if it doesn't show up.

To All,
I believe some of you have worked with Gnome Meeting for the Hard Hats
meeetings. Could someone contact me about success/failures/challenges?

Also, there may be an oppotrtunity to apply for a grant to get monies to
add/improve pediatric functionality to VistA.
Interested parties please contact me. off line..
Thanks in Advance

Alric


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to