Todd Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >webapps are kinda hard to get the interactivity (easily) that you can >get from a rich client. But that is differing of opinions.
Certainly, I am one who believes that the difficulty of getting rich interactivity from web applications has been overstated. Some of the differing opinions come from having different skills and experience and some of us perhaps not understanding how easily the applications we envision could be built and used and maintained with a set of tools different from the ones we know best. >It is a xplatform application that looks and feels very native, and has >binary cross-platformedness (is that a word?). Basically, we take the >binaries built on linux, and can run them on win32, osx, and linux w/o >any issues at all. I look forward to taking a close look at it when it becomes available. --------------------------------------- Jim Self Systems Architect, Lead Developer VMTH Computer Services, UC Davis (http://www.vmth.ucdavis.edu/us/jaself) ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
