On 8/2/05, Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my opinion, you're making a basic mistake here, and that is > ignoring the software engineering principle of separation of > concerns. Rather than saying that VistA should support connection via > SSH rather than telnet, I believe you are much better off saying > VistA should be able to work with a stream abstraction, which in turn > may or may not be implemented using SSH by the underlying operating > system. By not doing so, you run the risk of creating a tighter than > necessary coupling between VistA and the underlying platform, with > all its attendant headaches. Well I'm sure that I believe in the default installation of SSH and GPG. Yes that is true. Of course the are more options but I believe these are the best options to begin with.
;) Just my two cents. best Zeno ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
