I'm not complaining about lulls. The point is that having sent a message, I can determine if there was an unreasonable delay in processing it. Remember that Bhaskar raised the question of moving to another service because of problems with SourceForge, so the obious question was whether the list had suddenly gone quiet because of a lull in the conversation (not a problem), or because of a mail backlog (potentially a problem).
--- Kevin Toppenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Every conversation needs an occasional lull.. :-) > > > On 10/4/05, Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wondered about that. Since thee's been some discussion of whether > or > > not SourceForge is introducing delays (due to volume), I wondere if > the > > current lull was a real, or only apparent, delay. > > > > It seems that, at least for now, SourceForge is reasonably > responsive. > > > > --- "Frederick D. S. Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, > discussions, > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Hardhats-members mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members > === Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Without the requirement of mathematical aesthetics a great many discoveries would not have been made." -- Albert Einstein ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
