On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:50 -0500, Mark Dalton wrote:
> 
> I was not meaning for it to be a big discussion, just curious if it
> would be a good path to take.
> 
> I was hoping to find a simple solution and to help make development
> quicker and easier
> for us to work on it and have it truely portable (versus via wine).
> 
> I guess I will look more at FixIT since that is in a portable language
> and perhaps look at 
> the other peices.   I will not suggest porting again :)   I just look
> for another piece of vista to
> work on..  I highly suggest new work be done with portability and
> long-term support in mind.
> 

Mark, Just as a bit of extra information, the company I work for,
Medsphere, is currently porting CPRS to a new language and toolkit, and
it runs (we test every day) on win32, and linux without any issues. It
is nearing an initial level of completion of CPRS functionality.

We are hoping to make it available under open licensing and with a
completely transparent development model, but the main stumbling block
right now is the lack of a place to handle our development openly (think
sourceforge, and for us sourceforge will not work). And we are unwilling
to just do random unsupported code drops, we want to have an open
project, one that others can work on.

--Todd



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to