On Dec 31, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
I found the following line in the file DIS.m
set @("(J(N),DK)=+$piece("_R_"0),U,2)"),R=$piece(^(0),U)
would this be the same thing?
set (J(N),DK)=+$piece(@(R_0)),U,2)
set R=$piece(^(0),U)
Thanks
Kevin
By the way, this style of coding is no longer necessary because the
same thing can be expressed much more cleanly using closed roots and
subscript indirection. If S is "^VA(200)", then you only need write
S (J(N),DK)=$P(@S@(0),U,2)
I find this much more readable.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It is foolish to answer a question that
you do not understand."
--G. Polya ("How to Solve It")
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
